Securely Redirecting...

Connecting to Stripe

Back to Articles

Scaling Up: Why I Chose FastAPI Over Flask and Django for a Data API

Engineering

When building a cutting-edge data service like FXMacroData, the underlying API framework is the single most critical engineering decision. Our mission is simple: serve high-frequency macroeconomic and FX data instantly and reliably to traders, quants, and fintech teams worldwide.

To achieve this, we needed a Python framework that was fast, natively asynchronous, and perfectly suited for modern serverless deployment on Google Cloud Run. The standard contenders were Flask and Django. However, we ultimately chose FastAPI. Here is the technical breakdown of why FastAPI was the clear winner for building a performant, modern data API designed for the cloud.

The API Mandate: Performance and Serverless Efficiency

Our core requirement is high concurrency. Macroeconomic data services are I/O-bound—the API spends most of its time waiting for the database (Firestore) or other internal network services to return data, not performing heavy CPU calculations.

  • Flask (Synchronous/WSGI): Standard Flask is synchronous. This means a worker thread is blocked (or frozen) while it waits for an I/O operation (like fetching data) to complete. This inefficiency wastes computational resources and limits the number of concurrent users a single server can handle cost-effectively.
  • Django (Heavyweight Monolith): While powerful, Django is an opinionated, batteries-included framework. For a pure data API backend, its built-in ORM, templating, and session management were overkill. Deploying this large architecture just to serve data endpoints is inefficient, especially in a flexible, pay-per-use environment like Cloud Run.

⚡️ FastAPI: Natively Async for Optimal Cloud Scaling

FastAPI is built on the modern ASGI standard, making it asynchronous (async/await) from the ground up. This non-blocking architecture provided the critical performance advantage we needed.

  • Non-Blocking I/O: When a FastAPI worker initiates an I/O request (e.g., waiting for data from Firestore), instead of blocking, it can immediately switch to handling another pending request. This allows a single process to efficiently manage hundreds of concurrent requests using minimal resources.
  • Serverless Integration: Being lightweight and ASGI-native means FastAPI spins up and runs perfectly within the brief, resource-constrained lifespan of a serverless container. It aligns perfectly with Cloud Run's scaling model, where we only pay for the exact compute time used.

The Practical Difference: I/O Concurrency in Code

The benefit of native asynchronous programming is immediately clear when requesting data from multiple internal or external sources concurrently.

➡️ Flask (Synchronous Example)

Execution runs sequentially. The total execution time is the sum of the two delays (approx. 2 seconds), as the second call must wait for the first to complete. 

# Flask (Synchronous)
import time
from flask import Flask
app = Flask(__name__)

@app.route("/")
def sync_example():
    time.sleep(1)  # Wait for Source A
    time.sleep(1)  # Wait for Source B
    return "Total Time: ~2.0s"

➡️ FastAPI (Asynchronous Example)

Execution runs concurrently. The total execution time is the maximum of the two delays (approx. 1 second), as both I/O operations are initiated at the same time. 

# FastAPI (Asynchronous)
import asyncio
from fastapi import FastAPI
app = FastAPI()

@app.get("/")
async def async_example():
    await asyncio.gather(
        asyncio.sleep(1),  # Wait for Source A
        asyncio.sleep(1)   # Wait for Source B
    )
    return "Total Time: ~1.0s"

🧠 Developer Productivity and Reliability

Beyond raw performance and cloud architecture, FastAPI significantly improved our development process:

  • Automatic Validation: It leverages Pydantic models and standard Python type hints for automatic data validation, serialization, and deserialization. This dramatically reduces boilerplate code and virtually eliminates runtime data type errors.
  • Auto-Documentation: FastAPI automatically generates interactive, standardized OpenAPI documentation (Swagger UI). This is invaluable for our users—quant developers and fintech teams—who integrate the FXMacroData API.

In summary, choosing FastAPI allowed us to build a high-performance, stateless API that perfectly matches the pay-per-use efficiency of Google Cloud Run. It is technically superior and far more cost-effective for a modern data microservice than an over-engineered framework like Django.

If you're building a new data API focused on speed, efficiency, and cloud-native scaling, the choice is clear: go async with FastAPI.

— The FXMacroData Engineering Team

View All Articles